Review





Similar Products

95
Biotium qpcr
Qpcr, supplied by Biotium, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/qpcr/product/Biotium
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
qpcr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Beyotime membrane potential assay kit
PDK1 inhibitor JX06 and gefitinib synergistically induced cell apoptosis in gefitinib-resistant lung cancer cells. (A) The protein expression levels of PDK were reduced upon the treatment of PDK1 inhibitor JX06 in PC-9 and PC-9/G cells. (B) B2B and PC-9/G cells were treated with different concentrations of JX06 for 48 h. The cell viabilities were determined by CCK-8. (C – E) The synergy effect between JX06 and gefitinib was determined and analyzed with CompuSyn software. (F) The apoptosis rates were analyzed with flow cytometry after the combined treatment of gefitinib and JX06. (G) The TUNEL <t>assay</t> was performed with the indicated treatment in PC-9/G cells. (H) The cells treated as described were stained with the JC-1 probe and detected using a fluorescence microscope. Red fluorescence indicates the aggregation form of JC-1, showing increased mitochondrial <t>membrane</t> <t>potential</t> (ΔΨm). Green fluorescence indicates the monomeric form of JC-1, which indicates reduced mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). Data were statistically analyzed with Student’s t -test, and values were shown as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ P < 0.05 and ∗∗ P < 0.01.
Membrane Potential Assay Kit, supplied by Beyotime, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/membrane potential assay kit/product/Beyotime
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
membrane potential assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Beyotime mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit
Schematic representation of the synthesis process and therapeutic properties of Cryogel@USPB applied in wounds. (A) Fabrication process of Cryogel@USPB. (B) Cryogel@USPB promotes acute/chronic wounds through regulating macrophage polarization and restraining <t>mitochondrial</t> dysfunction via the cGAS-STING pathway.
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit, supplied by Beyotime, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit/product/Beyotime
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Beijing Solarbio Science mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with jc 1
mBH3@NPs preferentially induced mtApoptosis and immunogenic cell death in cancer cells (A) Flow cytometry analysis of cells positive for Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) in cancer and non-cancer cell lines after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, naked Puma mRNA, and mPuma@NPs for 12 h ( n = 3). (B) Western blot analysis of mitochondrial apoptois pathway in CT-26 cells treated with control, NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-x L , Mcl-1, caspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 (C-Cas3), caspase9, and cleaved caspase-9 (C-Cas9) proteins were detected. β-Actin was used as the loading control ( n = 3). (C) Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of the 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethyl-imidacarbocyanine <t>(JC-1)</t> probe in CT-26 cells after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h. Increased JC-1 monomer signal (green) and decreased JC-1 aggregate signal (red) indicate a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential ( n = 3). Scale bars, 200 μm. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of cellular oxygen species (ROS) levels using 2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) staining in CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, naked mRNA, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (E) CLSM images of CRT expression in B16-F10 and CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). Scale bars, 20 μm. (F) Extracellular ATP and HMGB1 expression levels were analyzed by ELISA in B16-F10 cells after 12-h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (G) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of immune stimulation in BMDCs co-cultured with B16-F10 cells pretreated with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h, followed by 48-h co-culture ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for all statistical analyses. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also .
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit With Jc 1, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with jc 1/product/Beijing Solarbio Science
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with jc 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Beyotime mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with jc 1
The killing efficacy and ferroptosis efficacy of ARCHER in vitro (A) The Sanger sequencing result of the PCR amplicon of the targeted locus after treatment with CRISPR/Cas9-GPX4 by ARCHER. (B) The image of the PCR amplicon of the targeted locus by T7E1 assay. From top to bottom, the first gel strip is 549 bp in length. (C) Images of fluorescence of Calcein AM/PI in B16-F10 cells after different treatments. Scale bars represent 500 μm. (D) The fluorescence images of ROS generation in B16-F10 cells with different treatments. Scale bars represent 200 μm. (E) The representative images of FITC of positive cells percent and statistics by FCM, in which B16-F10 cells received different treatments and were stained <t>with</t> <t>JC-1</t> by ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (∗∗ p < 0.01; ns, not significant; n = 3; mean ± SD). (F) Statistics of mitochondrial membrane potential change of B16-F10 cells treated with different preparations by ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, not significant; n = 3; mean ± SD). (G) The images of Bio-TEM of B16-F10 cells treated with ARCHER with/without laser. Scale bars represent 1 μm. (H) The confocal images of LPO in cells treated with different modalities and stained with C11 BOIDIPY. Scale bars represent 20 μm. (I–K) The analysis of LPO accumulation in B16-F10 cells receiving different nanoparticles treatment. The histogram for LPO (I) in single cells, quantitative analysis of FITC positive efficiency (J), and the MFI of FITC (K) of different nanoparticles on B16-F10 cells by ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, not significant; n = 3; mean ± SD). 1–7 refer to the treatment with PBS, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6Fe(III)Cl/PF33/CRISPR-Null, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6Fe(III)Cl/PF33/CRISPR-Null + laser, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6/PF33/CRISPR/Cas9-GPX4, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6/PF33/CRISPR/Cas9-GPX4 + laser, ARCHER, and ARCHER + laser.
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit With Jc 1, supplied by Beyotime, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with jc 1/product/Beyotime
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with jc 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Beijing Solarbio Science mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit
mBH3@NPs preferentially induced mtApoptosis and immunogenic cell death in cancer cells (A) Flow cytometry analysis of cells positive for Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) in cancer and non-cancer cell lines after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, naked Puma mRNA, and mPuma@NPs for 12 h ( n = 3). (B) Western blot analysis of <t>mitochondrial</t> apoptois pathway in CT-26 cells treated with control, NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-x L , Mcl-1, caspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 (C-Cas3), caspase9, and cleaved caspase-9 (C-Cas9) proteins were detected. β-Actin was used as the loading control ( n = 3). (C) Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of the 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethyl-imidacarbocyanine (JC-1) probe in CT-26 cells after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h. Increased JC-1 monomer signal (green) and decreased JC-1 aggregate signal (red) indicate a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential ( n = 3). Scale bars, 200 μm. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of cellular oxygen species (ROS) levels using 2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) staining in CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, naked mRNA, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (E) CLSM images of CRT expression in B16-F10 and CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). Scale bars, 20 μm. (F) Extracellular ATP and HMGB1 expression levels were analyzed by ELISA in B16-F10 cells after 12-h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (G) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of immune stimulation in BMDCs co-cultured with B16-F10 cells pretreated with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h, followed by 48-h co-culture ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for all statistical analyses. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also .
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit/product/Beijing Solarbio Science
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Beyotime enhanced mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with jc 1
CGF’s effect on ABC transporter pathway, mitochondrial function, and ROS in CRC (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the effect of CGF on ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells. Cells were stained with DCFH-DA, a ROS probe, and fluorescence intensity was measured. The lower panel shows the relative percentage of ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells under different treatments. (B) TEM observation of mitochondrial morphology in HCT116 (top) and HT29 (bottom) cells treated with CGF (50 μM, 24h). Arrows indicate normal mitochondrial morphology (scale bar, 20 μM). <t>(C)</t> <t>JC-1</t> staining was used to assess how CGF treatment affects the mitochondrial membrane potential in HCT116 and HT29 cells. The change in mitochondrial membrane potential is indicated by the red to green fluorescence ratio (scale bar, 20 μM). (D and E) Assessment of SOD (upper) and CAT (lower) enzyme activities in HCT116 and HT29 cells following CGF exposure. (F and G) RT-qPCR was used to analyze the relative expression levels of ABC transporter genes such as ABCA1 , ABCC2 , ABCB5 , and CFTR in HCT116 (F) and HT29 (G) cells exposed to varying concentrations of CGF. (H) Assays for ATP detection demonstrate the impact of CGF on ATP levels within HCT116 and HT29 cells, with four biological replicates. (I) Flow cytometry analysis of the effect of ATP on ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells. The right panel shows the relative percentage of ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells after ATP treatment. (A, D–I) Data presentation is in the form of mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
Enhanced Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit With Jc 1, supplied by Beyotime, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/enhanced mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with jc 1/product/Beyotime
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
enhanced mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with jc 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Beyotime mitochondrial membrane potential detection kit
Regulatory role of TOP2A in mast cell apoptosis, parthanatos pathway, and inflammatory response In vitro experimental groups: CON, model, Model+OE-NC, Model+OE-TOP2A, Model+si-NC, Model+si-TOP2A. (A and B) RT-qPCR and western blot analyses were conducted to assess the mRNA and protein expression levels of TOP2A and PARP-1 in mast cells. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (C) TUNEL staining was performed to evaluate and visualize cell apoptosis. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group; scale bars, 50 μm. (D) Cell proliferation activity in each group was measured using the CCK-8 assay. ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (E and F) MMP was assessed using the JC-1 assay to evaluate <t>mitochondrial</t> function. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (G) Western blotting was used to examine the protein levels of mitochondrial AIF (Mito-AIF), cytoplasmic AIF (Cyto-AIF), and nuclear AIF (Nucleo-AIF), along with visual analysis. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (H and I) ELISA was employed to determine the concentrations of β-hexosaminidase, Histamine, IL-4, IL-5, and IFN-γ. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. Data are represented as mean ± SEM ( n = 3 per group) from independent biological replicates. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc correction for (A–D) and (F–I).
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Detection Kit, supplied by Beyotime, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mitochondrial membrane potential detection kit/product/Beyotime
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mitochondrial membrane potential detection kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


PDK1 inhibitor JX06 and gefitinib synergistically induced cell apoptosis in gefitinib-resistant lung cancer cells. (A) The protein expression levels of PDK were reduced upon the treatment of PDK1 inhibitor JX06 in PC-9 and PC-9/G cells. (B) B2B and PC-9/G cells were treated with different concentrations of JX06 for 48 h. The cell viabilities were determined by CCK-8. (C – E) The synergy effect between JX06 and gefitinib was determined and analyzed with CompuSyn software. (F) The apoptosis rates were analyzed with flow cytometry after the combined treatment of gefitinib and JX06. (G) The TUNEL assay was performed with the indicated treatment in PC-9/G cells. (H) The cells treated as described were stained with the JC-1 probe and detected using a fluorescence microscope. Red fluorescence indicates the aggregation form of JC-1, showing increased mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). Green fluorescence indicates the monomeric form of JC-1, which indicates reduced mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). Data were statistically analyzed with Student’s t -test, and values were shown as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ P < 0.05 and ∗∗ P < 0.01.

Journal: Genes & Diseases

Article Title: PDK1 elevation was induced by epigenetic modifications of KDM3A and METTL16 to mediate TKI resistance and cancer development

doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101947

Figure Lengend Snippet: PDK1 inhibitor JX06 and gefitinib synergistically induced cell apoptosis in gefitinib-resistant lung cancer cells. (A) The protein expression levels of PDK were reduced upon the treatment of PDK1 inhibitor JX06 in PC-9 and PC-9/G cells. (B) B2B and PC-9/G cells were treated with different concentrations of JX06 for 48 h. The cell viabilities were determined by CCK-8. (C – E) The synergy effect between JX06 and gefitinib was determined and analyzed with CompuSyn software. (F) The apoptosis rates were analyzed with flow cytometry after the combined treatment of gefitinib and JX06. (G) The TUNEL assay was performed with the indicated treatment in PC-9/G cells. (H) The cells treated as described were stained with the JC-1 probe and detected using a fluorescence microscope. Red fluorescence indicates the aggregation form of JC-1, showing increased mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). Green fluorescence indicates the monomeric form of JC-1, which indicates reduced mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). Data were statistically analyzed with Student’s t -test, and values were shown as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ P < 0.05 and ∗∗ P < 0.01.

Article Snippet: After different treatments for 48 h, the mitochondrial membrane potential of cells was detected with the enhanced mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit using JC-1 probe (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China), and the fluorescence was analyzed with a fluorescence microscope.

Techniques: Expressing, CCK-8 Assay, Software, Flow Cytometry, TUNEL Assay, Staining, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Membrane, Standard Deviation

Schematic representation of the synthesis process and therapeutic properties of Cryogel@USPB applied in wounds. (A) Fabrication process of Cryogel@USPB. (B) Cryogel@USPB promotes acute/chronic wounds through regulating macrophage polarization and restraining mitochondrial dysfunction via the cGAS-STING pathway.

Journal: Materials Today Bio

Article Title: Ultrasmall Prussian blue–integrated cryogel for enhanced ROS scavenging and immunomodulation via cGAS–STING inhibition in wound healing

doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.103056

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic representation of the synthesis process and therapeutic properties of Cryogel@USPB applied in wounds. (A) Fabrication process of Cryogel@USPB. (B) Cryogel@USPB promotes acute/chronic wounds through regulating macrophage polarization and restraining mitochondrial dysfunction via the cGAS-STING pathway.

Article Snippet: The Catalase Assay Kit and Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit (JC-1) were from Beyotime Biotechnology Inc. (Shanghai, China).

Techniques:

The biocompatibility and antioxidant capability assessment of Cryogel@USPB. (A) Cell viability of NIH 3T3 and Raw264.7 cells after co-incubation with Cryogel@USPB at various concentrations (n = 3). (B) Representative fluorescent staining images of live (green)/dead (red) cells of Raw264.7 cells following co-incubation with Cryogel@USPB. (C) Determination of H 2 O 2 depletion capability of Cryogel@USPB (n = 3). (D) SOD-like activity and (E) POD-like activity of Cryogel@USPB (n = 3). (F) ·OH depletion capability and (G) •O 2 − depletion activity using EPR. (H) Representative fluorescent staining images of intracellular ROS in Raw264.7 cells following the treatment of H 2 O 2 and Cryogel@USPB. (I) TEM images of the mitochondria in RAW264.7 cells. (J) Fluorescent images of mitochondrial membrane potential in cells following different treatments. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Journal: Materials Today Bio

Article Title: Ultrasmall Prussian blue–integrated cryogel for enhanced ROS scavenging and immunomodulation via cGAS–STING inhibition in wound healing

doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.103056

Figure Lengend Snippet: The biocompatibility and antioxidant capability assessment of Cryogel@USPB. (A) Cell viability of NIH 3T3 and Raw264.7 cells after co-incubation with Cryogel@USPB at various concentrations (n = 3). (B) Representative fluorescent staining images of live (green)/dead (red) cells of Raw264.7 cells following co-incubation with Cryogel@USPB. (C) Determination of H 2 O 2 depletion capability of Cryogel@USPB (n = 3). (D) SOD-like activity and (E) POD-like activity of Cryogel@USPB (n = 3). (F) ·OH depletion capability and (G) •O 2 − depletion activity using EPR. (H) Representative fluorescent staining images of intracellular ROS in Raw264.7 cells following the treatment of H 2 O 2 and Cryogel@USPB. (I) TEM images of the mitochondria in RAW264.7 cells. (J) Fluorescent images of mitochondrial membrane potential in cells following different treatments. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Article Snippet: The Catalase Assay Kit and Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit (JC-1) were from Beyotime Biotechnology Inc. (Shanghai, China).

Techniques: Incubation, Staining, Activity Assay, Membrane

mBH3@NPs preferentially induced mtApoptosis and immunogenic cell death in cancer cells (A) Flow cytometry analysis of cells positive for Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) in cancer and non-cancer cell lines after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, naked Puma mRNA, and mPuma@NPs for 12 h ( n = 3). (B) Western blot analysis of mitochondrial apoptois pathway in CT-26 cells treated with control, NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-x L , Mcl-1, caspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 (C-Cas3), caspase9, and cleaved caspase-9 (C-Cas9) proteins were detected. β-Actin was used as the loading control ( n = 3). (C) Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of the 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethyl-imidacarbocyanine (JC-1) probe in CT-26 cells after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h. Increased JC-1 monomer signal (green) and decreased JC-1 aggregate signal (red) indicate a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential ( n = 3). Scale bars, 200 μm. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of cellular oxygen species (ROS) levels using 2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) staining in CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, naked mRNA, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (E) CLSM images of CRT expression in B16-F10 and CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). Scale bars, 20 μm. (F) Extracellular ATP and HMGB1 expression levels were analyzed by ELISA in B16-F10 cells after 12-h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (G) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of immune stimulation in BMDCs co-cultured with B16-F10 cells pretreated with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h, followed by 48-h co-culture ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for all statistical analyses. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also .

Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

Article Title: mRNA lipid-nanoparticle-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis augments adoptive T cell immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102706

Figure Lengend Snippet: mBH3@NPs preferentially induced mtApoptosis and immunogenic cell death in cancer cells (A) Flow cytometry analysis of cells positive for Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) in cancer and non-cancer cell lines after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, naked Puma mRNA, and mPuma@NPs for 12 h ( n = 3). (B) Western blot analysis of mitochondrial apoptois pathway in CT-26 cells treated with control, NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-x L , Mcl-1, caspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 (C-Cas3), caspase9, and cleaved caspase-9 (C-Cas9) proteins were detected. β-Actin was used as the loading control ( n = 3). (C) Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of the 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethyl-imidacarbocyanine (JC-1) probe in CT-26 cells after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h. Increased JC-1 monomer signal (green) and decreased JC-1 aggregate signal (red) indicate a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential ( n = 3). Scale bars, 200 μm. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of cellular oxygen species (ROS) levels using 2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) staining in CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, naked mRNA, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (E) CLSM images of CRT expression in B16-F10 and CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). Scale bars, 20 μm. (F) Extracellular ATP and HMGB1 expression levels were analyzed by ELISA in B16-F10 cells after 12-h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (G) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of immune stimulation in BMDCs co-cultured with B16-F10 cells pretreated with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h, followed by 48-h co-culture ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for all statistical analyses. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also .

Article Snippet: Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit with JC-1 , Solarbio , Cat#M8650.

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Control, Western Blot, Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy, Membrane, Staining, Incubation, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Cell Culture, Co-Culture Assay

mBH3@NPs synergized T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro (A) Workflow of procedures for evaluating T-cell-mediated killing effects in target cancer cells. (B) Sensitivity of freshly isolated resting T cells and activated T cells to mBH3@NPs treatment ( n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis of altered protein expression in T cells after pre-activation for 3 days. Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-x L , Mcl-1, caspase-3, and caspase-9 were detected. β-Actin was used as a loading control ( n = 3). (D) Quantification of B16-OVA tumor cell sensitivity to OT-1 T-cell-mediated killing following treatments of PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs at different E:T ratios (1:4, 1:2, 2:1, 4:1, and 10:1) by flow cytometry ( n = 3). (E) Flow cytometric quantification of B16-OVA tumor cell sensitivity to OT-1 T-cell-mediated killing following different dosages of mPuma@NPs (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 μg) at lower E:T ratios ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry histograms and quantification of Glut-1 OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. The co-culture was performed at an E:T ratio of 1:1 ( n = 3). (G) Glucose uptake capacity in OT-1 T cells was measured by flow cytometry using the 2-NBDG assay. (H) The cellular GSH:GSSG ratio was measured in OT-1 T cells after a 12-h co-culture with B16-OVA cells pre-treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. (I) Flow cytometry analysis of ROS levels of OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (J) Mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) in OT-1 T cells was assessed by flow cytometry using the JC-1 probe after co-culture with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. The Δψm is presented as the ratio of red (aggregates, high Δψm) to green (monomers, low Δψm) fluorescence intensity ( n = 3). (K) Flow cytometry histograms and quantification of PD-1 and LAG-3 expression of OT-I T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (L) Flow cytometry analysis of frequency of CD62L of OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for all statistical analyses. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also .

Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

Article Title: mRNA lipid-nanoparticle-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis augments adoptive T cell immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102706

Figure Lengend Snippet: mBH3@NPs synergized T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro (A) Workflow of procedures for evaluating T-cell-mediated killing effects in target cancer cells. (B) Sensitivity of freshly isolated resting T cells and activated T cells to mBH3@NPs treatment ( n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis of altered protein expression in T cells after pre-activation for 3 days. Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-x L , Mcl-1, caspase-3, and caspase-9 were detected. β-Actin was used as a loading control ( n = 3). (D) Quantification of B16-OVA tumor cell sensitivity to OT-1 T-cell-mediated killing following treatments of PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs at different E:T ratios (1:4, 1:2, 2:1, 4:1, and 10:1) by flow cytometry ( n = 3). (E) Flow cytometric quantification of B16-OVA tumor cell sensitivity to OT-1 T-cell-mediated killing following different dosages of mPuma@NPs (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 μg) at lower E:T ratios ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry histograms and quantification of Glut-1 OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. The co-culture was performed at an E:T ratio of 1:1 ( n = 3). (G) Glucose uptake capacity in OT-1 T cells was measured by flow cytometry using the 2-NBDG assay. (H) The cellular GSH:GSSG ratio was measured in OT-1 T cells after a 12-h co-culture with B16-OVA cells pre-treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. (I) Flow cytometry analysis of ROS levels of OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (J) Mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) in OT-1 T cells was assessed by flow cytometry using the JC-1 probe after co-culture with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. The Δψm is presented as the ratio of red (aggregates, high Δψm) to green (monomers, low Δψm) fluorescence intensity ( n = 3). (K) Flow cytometry histograms and quantification of PD-1 and LAG-3 expression of OT-I T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (L) Flow cytometry analysis of frequency of CD62L of OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for all statistical analyses. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also .

Article Snippet: Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit with JC-1 , Solarbio , Cat#M8650.

Techniques: In Vitro, Isolation, Western Blot, Expressing, Activation Assay, Control, Flow Cytometry, Cell Culture, Co-Culture Assay, Membrane, Fluorescence

The killing efficacy and ferroptosis efficacy of ARCHER in vitro (A) The Sanger sequencing result of the PCR amplicon of the targeted locus after treatment with CRISPR/Cas9-GPX4 by ARCHER. (B) The image of the PCR amplicon of the targeted locus by T7E1 assay. From top to bottom, the first gel strip is 549 bp in length. (C) Images of fluorescence of Calcein AM/PI in B16-F10 cells after different treatments. Scale bars represent 500 μm. (D) The fluorescence images of ROS generation in B16-F10 cells with different treatments. Scale bars represent 200 μm. (E) The representative images of FITC of positive cells percent and statistics by FCM, in which B16-F10 cells received different treatments and were stained with JC-1 by ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (∗∗ p < 0.01; ns, not significant; n = 3; mean ± SD). (F) Statistics of mitochondrial membrane potential change of B16-F10 cells treated with different preparations by ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, not significant; n = 3; mean ± SD). (G) The images of Bio-TEM of B16-F10 cells treated with ARCHER with/without laser. Scale bars represent 1 μm. (H) The confocal images of LPO in cells treated with different modalities and stained with C11 BOIDIPY. Scale bars represent 20 μm. (I–K) The analysis of LPO accumulation in B16-F10 cells receiving different nanoparticles treatment. The histogram for LPO (I) in single cells, quantitative analysis of FITC positive efficiency (J), and the MFI of FITC (K) of different nanoparticles on B16-F10 cells by ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, not significant; n = 3; mean ± SD). 1–7 refer to the treatment with PBS, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6Fe(III)Cl/PF33/CRISPR-Null, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6Fe(III)Cl/PF33/CRISPR-Null + laser, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6/PF33/CRISPR/Cas9-GPX4, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6/PF33/CRISPR/Cas9-GPX4 + laser, ARCHER, and ARCHER + laser.

Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

Article Title: A harmless-to-harmful switchable and spatiotemporally activated nano-CRISPR hierarchically amplifies ferroptosis in melanoma

doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102718

Figure Lengend Snippet: The killing efficacy and ferroptosis efficacy of ARCHER in vitro (A) The Sanger sequencing result of the PCR amplicon of the targeted locus after treatment with CRISPR/Cas9-GPX4 by ARCHER. (B) The image of the PCR amplicon of the targeted locus by T7E1 assay. From top to bottom, the first gel strip is 549 bp in length. (C) Images of fluorescence of Calcein AM/PI in B16-F10 cells after different treatments. Scale bars represent 500 μm. (D) The fluorescence images of ROS generation in B16-F10 cells with different treatments. Scale bars represent 200 μm. (E) The representative images of FITC of positive cells percent and statistics by FCM, in which B16-F10 cells received different treatments and were stained with JC-1 by ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (∗∗ p < 0.01; ns, not significant; n = 3; mean ± SD). (F) Statistics of mitochondrial membrane potential change of B16-F10 cells treated with different preparations by ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, not significant; n = 3; mean ± SD). (G) The images of Bio-TEM of B16-F10 cells treated with ARCHER with/without laser. Scale bars represent 1 μm. (H) The confocal images of LPO in cells treated with different modalities and stained with C11 BOIDIPY. Scale bars represent 20 μm. (I–K) The analysis of LPO accumulation in B16-F10 cells receiving different nanoparticles treatment. The histogram for LPO (I) in single cells, quantitative analysis of FITC positive efficiency (J), and the MFI of FITC (K) of different nanoparticles on B16-F10 cells by ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, not significant; n = 3; mean ± SD). 1–7 refer to the treatment with PBS, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6Fe(III)Cl/PF33/CRISPR-Null, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6Fe(III)Cl/PF33/CRISPR-Null + laser, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6/PF33/CRISPR/Cas9-GPX4, RGD-R8-PEG-HA-ADH-Ce6/PF33/CRISPR/Cas9-GPX4 + laser, ARCHER, and ARCHER + laser.

Article Snippet: Mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with JC-1 , Beyotime , Cat# C2006.

Techniques: In Vitro, Sequencing, Amplification, CRISPR, Stripping Membranes, Fluorescence, Staining, Membrane

mBH3@NPs preferentially induced mtApoptosis and immunogenic cell death in cancer cells (A) Flow cytometry analysis of cells positive for Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) in cancer and non-cancer cell lines after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, naked Puma mRNA, and mPuma@NPs for 12 h ( n = 3). (B) Western blot analysis of mitochondrial apoptois pathway in CT-26 cells treated with control, NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-x L , Mcl-1, caspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 (C-Cas3), caspase9, and cleaved caspase-9 (C-Cas9) proteins were detected. β-Actin was used as the loading control ( n = 3). (C) Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of the 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethyl-imidacarbocyanine (JC-1) probe in CT-26 cells after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h. Increased JC-1 monomer signal (green) and decreased JC-1 aggregate signal (red) indicate a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential ( n = 3). Scale bars, 200 μm. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of cellular oxygen species (ROS) levels using 2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) staining in CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, naked mRNA, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (E) CLSM images of CRT expression in B16-F10 and CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). Scale bars, 20 μm. (F) Extracellular ATP and HMGB1 expression levels were analyzed by ELISA in B16-F10 cells after 12-h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (G) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of immune stimulation in BMDCs co-cultured with B16-F10 cells pretreated with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h, followed by 48-h co-culture ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for all statistical analyses. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also .

Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

Article Title: mRNA lipid-nanoparticle-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis augments adoptive T cell immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102706

Figure Lengend Snippet: mBH3@NPs preferentially induced mtApoptosis and immunogenic cell death in cancer cells (A) Flow cytometry analysis of cells positive for Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) in cancer and non-cancer cell lines after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, naked Puma mRNA, and mPuma@NPs for 12 h ( n = 3). (B) Western blot analysis of mitochondrial apoptois pathway in CT-26 cells treated with control, NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-x L , Mcl-1, caspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 (C-Cas3), caspase9, and cleaved caspase-9 (C-Cas9) proteins were detected. β-Actin was used as the loading control ( n = 3). (C) Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of the 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethyl-imidacarbocyanine (JC-1) probe in CT-26 cells after treatment with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h. Increased JC-1 monomer signal (green) and decreased JC-1 aggregate signal (red) indicate a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential ( n = 3). Scale bars, 200 μm. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of cellular oxygen species (ROS) levels using 2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) staining in CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, naked mRNA, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (E) CLSM images of CRT expression in B16-F10 and CT-26 cells after 12 h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). Scale bars, 20 μm. (F) Extracellular ATP and HMGB1 expression levels were analyzed by ELISA in B16-F10 cells after 12-h incubation with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (G) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of immune stimulation in BMDCs co-cultured with B16-F10 cells pretreated with PBS (control), NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs for 12 h, followed by 48-h co-culture ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for all statistical analyses. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also .

Article Snippet: CT-26 and B16-F10 cells (2×10 5 per well) were seeded in a 12-well plate, treated with PBS, NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs (1 μg mL −1 ) for 12 h. The level of ROS and mitochondrial membrane potential in cells were detected using the ROS Assay Kit and Mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with JC-1 (Solarbio Science Technology Co., Ltd.), respectively.

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Control, Western Blot, Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy, Membrane, Staining, Incubation, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Cell Culture, Co-Culture Assay

mBH3@NPs synergized T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro (A) Workflow of procedures for evaluating T-cell-mediated killing effects in target cancer cells. (B) Sensitivity of freshly isolated resting T cells and activated T cells to mBH3@NPs treatment ( n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis of altered protein expression in T cells after pre-activation for 3 days. Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-x L , Mcl-1, caspase-3, and caspase-9 were detected. β-Actin was used as a loading control ( n = 3). (D) Quantification of B16-OVA tumor cell sensitivity to OT-1 T-cell-mediated killing following treatments of PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs at different E:T ratios (1:4, 1:2, 2:1, 4:1, and 10:1) by flow cytometry ( n = 3). (E) Flow cytometric quantification of B16-OVA tumor cell sensitivity to OT-1 T-cell-mediated killing following different dosages of mPuma@NPs (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 μg) at lower E:T ratios ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry histograms and quantification of Glut-1 OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. The co-culture was performed at an E:T ratio of 1:1 ( n = 3). (G) Glucose uptake capacity in OT-1 T cells was measured by flow cytometry using the 2-NBDG assay. (H) The cellular GSH:GSSG ratio was measured in OT-1 T cells after a 12-h co-culture with B16-OVA cells pre-treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. (I) Flow cytometry analysis of ROS levels of OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (J) Mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) in OT-1 T cells was assessed by flow cytometry using the JC-1 probe after co-culture with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. The Δψm is presented as the ratio of red (aggregates, high Δψm) to green (monomers, low Δψm) fluorescence intensity ( n = 3). (K) Flow cytometry histograms and quantification of PD-1 and LAG-3 expression of OT-I T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (L) Flow cytometry analysis of frequency of CD62L of OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for all statistical analyses. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also .

Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

Article Title: mRNA lipid-nanoparticle-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis augments adoptive T cell immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102706

Figure Lengend Snippet: mBH3@NPs synergized T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro (A) Workflow of procedures for evaluating T-cell-mediated killing effects in target cancer cells. (B) Sensitivity of freshly isolated resting T cells and activated T cells to mBH3@NPs treatment ( n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis of altered protein expression in T cells after pre-activation for 3 days. Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-x L , Mcl-1, caspase-3, and caspase-9 were detected. β-Actin was used as a loading control ( n = 3). (D) Quantification of B16-OVA tumor cell sensitivity to OT-1 T-cell-mediated killing following treatments of PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs at different E:T ratios (1:4, 1:2, 2:1, 4:1, and 10:1) by flow cytometry ( n = 3). (E) Flow cytometric quantification of B16-OVA tumor cell sensitivity to OT-1 T-cell-mediated killing following different dosages of mPuma@NPs (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 μg) at lower E:T ratios ( n = 3). (F) Flow cytometry histograms and quantification of Glut-1 OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. The co-culture was performed at an E:T ratio of 1:1 ( n = 3). (G) Glucose uptake capacity in OT-1 T cells was measured by flow cytometry using the 2-NBDG assay. (H) The cellular GSH:GSSG ratio was measured in OT-1 T cells after a 12-h co-culture with B16-OVA cells pre-treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. (I) Flow cytometry analysis of ROS levels of OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (J) Mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) in OT-1 T cells was assessed by flow cytometry using the JC-1 probe after co-culture with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs. The Δψm is presented as the ratio of red (aggregates, high Δψm) to green (monomers, low Δψm) fluorescence intensity ( n = 3). (K) Flow cytometry histograms and quantification of PD-1 and LAG-3 expression of OT-I T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). (L) Flow cytometry analysis of frequency of CD62L of OT-1 T cells co-cultured with B16-OVA cells treated with PBS, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for all statistical analyses. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also .

Article Snippet: CT-26 and B16-F10 cells (2×10 5 per well) were seeded in a 12-well plate, treated with PBS, NPs, mPuma@NPs, and mBim@NPs (1 μg mL −1 ) for 12 h. The level of ROS and mitochondrial membrane potential in cells were detected using the ROS Assay Kit and Mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with JC-1 (Solarbio Science Technology Co., Ltd.), respectively.

Techniques: In Vitro, Isolation, Western Blot, Expressing, Activation Assay, Control, Flow Cytometry, Cell Culture, Co-Culture Assay, Membrane, Fluorescence

CGF’s effect on ABC transporter pathway, mitochondrial function, and ROS in CRC (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the effect of CGF on ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells. Cells were stained with DCFH-DA, a ROS probe, and fluorescence intensity was measured. The lower panel shows the relative percentage of ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells under different treatments. (B) TEM observation of mitochondrial morphology in HCT116 (top) and HT29 (bottom) cells treated with CGF (50 μM, 24h). Arrows indicate normal mitochondrial morphology (scale bar, 20 μM). (C) JC-1 staining was used to assess how CGF treatment affects the mitochondrial membrane potential in HCT116 and HT29 cells. The change in mitochondrial membrane potential is indicated by the red to green fluorescence ratio (scale bar, 20 μM). (D and E) Assessment of SOD (upper) and CAT (lower) enzyme activities in HCT116 and HT29 cells following CGF exposure. (F and G) RT-qPCR was used to analyze the relative expression levels of ABC transporter genes such as ABCA1 , ABCC2 , ABCB5 , and CFTR in HCT116 (F) and HT29 (G) cells exposed to varying concentrations of CGF. (H) Assays for ATP detection demonstrate the impact of CGF on ATP levels within HCT116 and HT29 cells, with four biological replicates. (I) Flow cytometry analysis of the effect of ATP on ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells. The right panel shows the relative percentage of ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells after ATP treatment. (A, D–I) Data presentation is in the form of mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

Journal: iScience

Article Title: CGF induces ROS-mediated metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial dysfunction to suppress colorectal cancer progression

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115273

Figure Lengend Snippet: CGF’s effect on ABC transporter pathway, mitochondrial function, and ROS in CRC (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the effect of CGF on ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells. Cells were stained with DCFH-DA, a ROS probe, and fluorescence intensity was measured. The lower panel shows the relative percentage of ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells under different treatments. (B) TEM observation of mitochondrial morphology in HCT116 (top) and HT29 (bottom) cells treated with CGF (50 μM, 24h). Arrows indicate normal mitochondrial morphology (scale bar, 20 μM). (C) JC-1 staining was used to assess how CGF treatment affects the mitochondrial membrane potential in HCT116 and HT29 cells. The change in mitochondrial membrane potential is indicated by the red to green fluorescence ratio (scale bar, 20 μM). (D and E) Assessment of SOD (upper) and CAT (lower) enzyme activities in HCT116 and HT29 cells following CGF exposure. (F and G) RT-qPCR was used to analyze the relative expression levels of ABC transporter genes such as ABCA1 , ABCC2 , ABCB5 , and CFTR in HCT116 (F) and HT29 (G) cells exposed to varying concentrations of CGF. (H) Assays for ATP detection demonstrate the impact of CGF on ATP levels within HCT116 and HT29 cells, with four biological replicates. (I) Flow cytometry analysis of the effect of ATP on ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells. The right panel shows the relative percentage of ROS levels in HCT116 and HT29 cells after ATP treatment. (A, D–I) Data presentation is in the form of mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Enhanced mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit with JC-1 , Beyotime , Cat #C2003S.

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Staining, Fluorescence, Membrane, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing

Regulatory role of TOP2A in mast cell apoptosis, parthanatos pathway, and inflammatory response In vitro experimental groups: CON, model, Model+OE-NC, Model+OE-TOP2A, Model+si-NC, Model+si-TOP2A. (A and B) RT-qPCR and western blot analyses were conducted to assess the mRNA and protein expression levels of TOP2A and PARP-1 in mast cells. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (C) TUNEL staining was performed to evaluate and visualize cell apoptosis. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group; scale bars, 50 μm. (D) Cell proliferation activity in each group was measured using the CCK-8 assay. ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (E and F) MMP was assessed using the JC-1 assay to evaluate mitochondrial function. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (G) Western blotting was used to examine the protein levels of mitochondrial AIF (Mito-AIF), cytoplasmic AIF (Cyto-AIF), and nuclear AIF (Nucleo-AIF), along with visual analysis. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (H and I) ELISA was employed to determine the concentrations of β-hexosaminidase, Histamine, IL-4, IL-5, and IFN-γ. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. Data are represented as mean ± SEM ( n = 3 per group) from independent biological replicates. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc correction for (A–D) and (F–I).

Journal: iScience

Article Title: PBX3 regulates mast cell parthanatos via TOP2A mediated DNA damage in allergic rhinitis

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115426

Figure Lengend Snippet: Regulatory role of TOP2A in mast cell apoptosis, parthanatos pathway, and inflammatory response In vitro experimental groups: CON, model, Model+OE-NC, Model+OE-TOP2A, Model+si-NC, Model+si-TOP2A. (A and B) RT-qPCR and western blot analyses were conducted to assess the mRNA and protein expression levels of TOP2A and PARP-1 in mast cells. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (C) TUNEL staining was performed to evaluate and visualize cell apoptosis. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group; scale bars, 50 μm. (D) Cell proliferation activity in each group was measured using the CCK-8 assay. ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (E and F) MMP was assessed using the JC-1 assay to evaluate mitochondrial function. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (G) Western blotting was used to examine the protein levels of mitochondrial AIF (Mito-AIF), cytoplasmic AIF (Cyto-AIF), and nuclear AIF (Nucleo-AIF), along with visual analysis. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. (H and I) ELISA was employed to determine the concentrations of β-hexosaminidase, Histamine, IL-4, IL-5, and IFN-γ. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs. the CON or Model+OE-NC or Model+si-NC group. Data are represented as mean ± SEM ( n = 3 per group) from independent biological replicates. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc correction for (A–D) and (F–I).

Article Snippet: Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Detection Kit (JC-1) , Beyotime , Cat# C2006.

Techniques: In Vitro, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Expressing, TUNEL Assay, Staining, Activity Assay, CCK-8 Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay